🛸 UAP × Pentagon Programs × Sworn Congressional Testimony 🛸 不明异常现象 × 五角大楼项目 × 国会宣誓证词

UAP Disclosure: The Modern Era

UAP信息解密:现代时代

Forget Roswell. Forget grainy amateur photos. The modern UAP story is about trained military pilots, advanced sensor systems, Pentagon-funded black programs, a multi-billion-dollar whistleblower complaint, and sworn Congressional testimony. Two equally credible-sounding narratives now sit side by side — and somebody is wrong.

请暂且放下罗斯威尔,放下那些模糊不清的业余照片。现代UAP的故事,讲述的是一群训练有素的军方飞行员、先进的传感器系统、五角大楼资助的黑色预算项目、一份震动华盛顿的吹哨人申诉,以及在美国国会宣誓下作出的证词。如今,两种同样具有说服力的叙事并肩而立——而其中必有一方在说谎。

Witnesses David Grusch, David Fravor, and Ryan Graves testifying before the House Oversight subcommittee, July 26, 2023 证人戴维·格鲁什、戴维·弗拉沃尔和瑞安·格雷夫斯在众议院监督委员会作证,2023年7月26日

David Grusch, David Fravor, and Ryan Graves testifying under oath before the House Oversight subcommittee, July 26, 2023. Source: Wikimedia Commons (public domain).

戴维·格鲁什、戴维·弗拉沃尔与瑞安·格雷夫斯在众议院监督委员会宣誓作证,2023年7月26日。来源:维基共享资源(公有领域)。

1,652AARO CasesAARO案例 1442021 ODNI Incidents2021 ODNI事件 3Declassified Videos解密视频 $22MAAWSAP BudgetAAWSAP预算 40+Grusch Sources格鲁什线人

⚖️ Two Stories, One Truth

⚖️ 两种叙事,一个真相

The UAP debate isn't skeptics versus believers anymore. It's Pentagon insider versus Pentagon insider — both with active clearances, both testifying under oath, both telling Congress flatly opposite things.

如今的UAP争论,早已不是怀疑论者与信徒之间的对垒。这是一场发生在五角大楼内部的对抗——双方都持有现行密级许可,都曾在国会宣誓作证,却向议员们讲述了截然相反的两个故事。

The Stakes 争论的分量
Both Sides Are Swearing Under Penalty of Perjury
双方都在以伪证罪风险作出宣誓
This is not UFO fan fiction. Both camps have active security clearances and legal consequences for lying to Congress. Kirkpatrick, a materials physicist who ran AARO, resigned in late 2023 and has publicly called the whistleblower claims conspiracy-driven. Grusch, a decorated intelligence officer, has filed whistleblower protections through statutory channels. On July 26, 2023, Grusch, Fravor, and Graves each raised their right hands before the House Oversight Committee. One side of the debate is wrong, and the journalism jury is still out. That unresolved tension IS the modern UAP story.
这不是UFO爱好者的同人小说。双方当事人都持有现行密级许可,一旦对国会撒谎,都将面临严厉的法律后果。柯克帕特里克是一位研究材料的物理学家,曾任AARO首任主任,2023年底辞职,此后公开批评吹哨人言论受阴谋论驱动。格鲁什则是一名获得勋章的情报官员,依法通过吹哨人保护渠道提交了申诉。2023年7月26日,格鲁什、弗拉沃尔与格雷夫斯三人并排站在众议院监督委员会前,高举右手宣誓作证。至少有一方在说谎——而新闻界至今仍未给出定论。正是这种悬而未决的张力,构成了现代UAP故事的核心。

"I am happy to do that story, as long as we are not talking about little green men. If you want to talk about science, I'm all in."

"我很乐意谈这件事,只要我们不是在讲什么小绿人。如果你想谈科学,我奉陪到底。"

— Sen. Harry Reid, 2019, on the Pentagon's AAWSAP program he helped create

——参议员哈里·里德,2019年,谈他推动创立的五角大楼AAWSAP项目

🛸 The 2004 Tic Tac Incident

🛸 2004年 Tic Tac 事件

November 14, 2004. One hundred miles southwest of San Diego. The encounter that would — thirteen years later — break the story wide open.

2004年11月14日,圣地亚哥西南约一百英里的太平洋上空。一次空中相遇——在十三年后,将把整个故事彻底掀开。

USS Nimitz (CVN-68) aircraft carrier underway 尼米兹号航空母舰(CVN-68)航行中

USS Nimitz (CVN-68). Source: U.S. Navy / Wikimedia Commons (public domain).

尼米兹号航空母舰(CVN-68)。来源:美国海军 / 维基共享资源(公有领域)。

The Ocean Disturbance 海面扰动
Something Churning the Water Beneath It
某物在它下方搅动海水
Fravor reported that the Tic Tac was hovering above what looked like a cross-shaped disturbance just below the surface of a calm Pacific — "like something the size of a 737 was about to breach the surface." The disturbance vanished as the object departed. This "trans-medium" behavior — the ability to operate in both air and water — is one of the characteristics that led Congress in the FY23 NDAA to formally expand AARO's mandate to cover "transmedium" objects, and is one of the reasons the Navy, not the Air Force, became the service most publicly engaged on UAPs. Trans-medium capability is not a feature of any known US or foreign aircraft.
弗拉沃尔报告说,这枚Tic Tac正悬停在一片十字形的海面扰动之上——那天太平洋一片平静,扰动却仿佛是"一架波音737大小的东西即将破水而出"。物体离开之后,扰动也随之消失。这种"跨介质"行为——可以在空气和水中同时运动——正是让国会在2023财年国防授权法中将AARO的职权范围正式扩大至"跨介质物体"的重要原因之一,也是海军(而非空军)成为美方在UAP议题上最显眼参与方的理由之一。任何一款已知的美制或外国飞行器都不具备跨介质能力。
Supporting Witnesses 其他证人
Four Pilots, One Cruiser, Multiple Radars
四名飞行员、一艘巡洋舰、多部雷达
What makes the Tic Tac encounter so difficult to dismiss is how many independent data points corroborate it. The Princeton's SPY-1 AEGIS radar had tracked these objects for days before Fravor was ever launched. Four pilots in two F/A-18s visually observed the object. A third F/A-18 piloted by Lt. Cmdr. Chad Underwood tracked it on ATFLIR. Senior Chief Operations Specialist Kevin Day — the Princeton radar operator who first spotted the anomalies — has since gone on the record publicly. In 2021 the Pentagon formally confirmed the videos are real and were made by naval aviators. In 2021 the ODNI preliminary assessment counted this and 143 other incidents as credible unexplained events.
Tic Tac事件之所以难以被轻易否定,正在于它有大量相互独立的证据链彼此印证。早在弗拉沃尔起飞之前,普林斯顿号上的SPY-1"宙斯盾"雷达就已连续数日追踪到这批物体。四名分乘两架F/A-18的飞行员目视确认了它的存在。第三架由查德·安德伍德中校驾驶的F/A-18则通过ATFLIR吊舱全程跟踪。最早发现异常的普林斯顿号雷达操作员、高级上士凯文·戴伊此后也多次公开发声。2021年,五角大楼正式确认这些视频真实无误,均由海军飞行员拍摄。同年,美国国家情报总监办公室(ODNI)发布的初步评估报告,将这起事件与另外143起事件并列为"可信而无法解释"的案例。

📡 The East Coast Sightings (2014–2015)

📡 东海岸目击事件(2014–2015)

Ten years after the Tic Tac, a different squadron on the opposite coast started seeing UAPs every single day — after a radar upgrade suddenly made them visible.

Tic Tac事件十年后,大西洋彼岸的另一个中队开始每天都能看到UAP——一次雷达系统升级,让这些物体突然变得肉眼可辨。

Near-Miss 险些相撞
One Object Came Within 50 Feet of a Super Hornet
一个物体距超级大黄蜂仅15米
The incident that turned Graves from pilot to advocate happened when one object came within about fifty feet of an F/A-18 flown by a squadronmate — a near-midair collision in restricted military training airspace. It was not reported up the chain in the normal way, because the existing Naval safety reporting system had no category for "unidentified." The near-miss, and the bureaucratic dead-end that followed, is what led Graves to eventually found Americans for Safe Aerospace and testify before Congress. His core argument is simple: regardless of what these things are, the Federal Aviation Administration and the Department of Defense have an aviation-safety obligation to find out, and to give pilots a way to report them without career consequences.
真正让格雷夫斯从飞行员转变为倡导者的,是一次险些酿成空中相撞的事故——当时一个物体距他同中队队友驾驶的F/A-18不到约15米,发生在军方限制训练空域内。事后这一事件并未按常规程序层层上报,原因很简单:海军现有的安全报告系统里根本没有"不明物体"这一类别。这次险情以及随之而来的官僚死胡同,最终促使格雷夫斯创立了"守护美国航空安全"组织,并走进了国会作证。他的核心诉求其实非常朴素:无论这些东西究竟是什么,联邦航空管理局和国防部都负有航空安全责任,必须查清原因;并应为飞行员提供一条安全的汇报渠道,让他们不必因此担心职业生涯受到影响。
Ryan Graves Goes Public 格雷夫斯走向公众
The First Active-Duty Navy Pilot to Go On the Record
首位公开发声的现役海军飞行员
Graves was the first active-duty US Navy pilot to publicly go on the record about regular UAP encounters — first in a May 2019 New York Times follow-up article, then in additional press coverage that followed. By the time CBS 60 Minutes aired "UFOs on the Radar" in May 2021 with Bill Whitaker, Graves was a former Navy Lieutenant, but the segment brought his account — and Fravor's and Dietrich's — into millions of American living rooms. He went on to long-form interviews with The New York Times, Joe Rogan, and Lex Fridman, and in 2021 founded Americans for Safe Aerospace — a pilot-led advocacy organization focused on aviation safety and reporting mechanisms. He testified under oath at the July 26, 2023 House Oversight hearing alongside Fravor and Grusch, placing his own credibility on the line.
格雷夫斯是首位公开上镜谈论UAP遭遇的美国现役海军飞行员——他最早是在2019年5月《纽约时报》的一篇后续报道中公开发声,之后又接受了一系列其他媒体采访。到2021年5月CBS《60分钟》节目播出比尔·惠特克主持的"UFOs on the Radar"一期时,格雷夫斯已退役(军衔为海军中尉),但这期节目把他以及弗拉沃尔、迪特里希的亲历讲述送进了数百万美国家庭。此后他又接受了《纽约时报》、乔·罗根和莱克斯·弗里德曼等主流媒体的长篇专访,并于2021年创立了"守护美国航空安全"组织——一个以飞行员为主体、聚焦于航空安全与汇报机制的倡导团体。2023年7月26日,他与弗拉沃尔和格鲁什一起走上众议院监督委员会听证席,在宣誓之下亲自把自己的信誉全部押上了台面。

🏛️ The Hidden Pentagon Programs

🏛️ 五角大楼里那些隐秘的项目

From a $22 million black-budget line item buried in DIA appropriations to today's official All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, the Pentagon has been quietly studying UAPs for almost twenty years.

从一笔藏匿在国防情报局拨款中的两千两百万美元黑色预算,到如今正式挂牌的全域异常现象解析办公室,五角大楼几乎已经悄悄研究UAP将近二十年。

Main gate of Area 51 with restricted access warning signs 51区主入口,悬挂着限制进入的警告标志

Main gate of the Nevada Test and Training Range — Area 51 — the historical bookend of the modern UAP story. The Pentagon's twenty-first-century UAP work happens far from Groom Lake, but in the popular imagination it all still starts here. Source: Wikimedia Commons (Creative Commons).

内华达试验与训练靶场——也就是俗称的"51区"——主入口。它构成了现代UAP故事的历史另一端。五角大楼21世纪的UAP工作早已远离格鲁姆湖,但在公众想象中,一切依然从这里开始。来源:维基共享资源(知识共享协议)。

Elizondo's Disputed Role 埃利松多存争议的角色
Did He Run AATIP, or Didn't He?
他到底有没有领导过AATIP?
The name AATIP entered the public lexicon on December 16, 2017, when The New York Times described it as the program Luis Elizondo had led from inside the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence (OUSDI) until his October 2017 resignation. The Pentagon has publicly contested that characterization. A DoD spokesperson told The Intercept in 2019 that Elizondo "had no responsibilities" with respect to AATIP in his official OUSDI role. Former AARO director Sean Kirkpatrick, writing in Scientific American in January 2024, described AATIP as a former DIA program "heavily influenced by a group of individuals associated with" Robert Bigelow, and made no mention of Elizondo running it. The dispute over what AATIP formally was — and whether Elizondo led it — remains unresolved.
AATIP这个缩写真正进入公众视野,是在2017年12月16日《纽约时报》的爆料文章中——该报道将其描述为路易斯·埃利松多在五角大楼情报事务副部长办公室(OUSDI)内部领导的项目,直至他在2017年10月辞职为止。五角大楼公开否认了这一说法。2019年,国防部一位发言人对《拦截》杂志表示,埃利松多在OUSDI的正式岗位上"对AATIP不承担任何职责"。前AARO主任肖恩·柯克帕特里克在2024年1月发表于《科学美国人》的文章中,将AATIP描述为国防情报局的一项"受到与罗伯特·毕格罗有关的一小群人严重影响"的前项目,通篇并未提及埃利松多曾领导该项目。AATIP在制度上究竟是什么、埃利松多是否真的领导过它——至今仍是一桩悬案。
UAPTF UAPTF
August 2020: The Task Force That Made the ODNI Report
2020年8月:促成ODNI报告的特别工作组
On August 14, 2020, Deputy Secretary of Defense David Norquist established the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force (UAPTF), under the direction of the Department of the Navy. UAPTF's job was to detect, analyze, and catalog UAPs that could pose a threat to US national security — and to deliver a public report to Congress within 180 days of an annual NDAA mandate. That report became the June 25, 2021 ODNI Preliminary Assessment, which counted 144 UAP incidents from 2004 to 2021, only one of which had been explained (a deflating balloon). The report was widely seen as the U.S. government's most consequential public acknowledgment of UAPs since Project Blue Book ended in 1969.
2020年8月14日,副国防部长戴维·诺奎斯特正式设立"不明空中现象特遣队"(UAPTF),由海军部主管。该特遣队的任务,是发现、分析并归档可能对美国国家安全构成威胁的UAP,并依据国防授权法的年度规定,在180天内向国会提交一份公开报告。这份报告便是2021年6月25日由国家情报总监办公室(ODNI)发布的《初步评估报告》——其中收录了2004年至2021年间共144起UAP事件,最终仅有一起得到解释(是一只正在漏气的气球)。这份报告被广泛视为继1969年"蓝皮书计划"终止之后,美国政府对UAP最具分量的一次公开承认。
AOIMSG → AARO AOIMSG → AARO
From Synchronization Group to All-Domain Office
从协调小组到全域办公室
In November 2021, the Pentagon replaced the Navy-led UAPTF with the Airborne Object Identification and Management Synchronization Group (AOIMSG), reporting to the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security. Less than a year later, on July 15, 2022, Deputy SecDef Kathleen Hicks formally established the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), replacing AOIMSG with a broader mandate covering air, sea, space, and trans-medium phenomena. The FY23 NDAA further expanded AARO's scope to include historical investigations going back to 1945. AARO is the current, formal home of the Pentagon's UAP work — and the office that has become the public face of the skeptical, "no aliens" position.
2021年11月,五角大楼撤销了由海军主导的UAPTF,改设"空中物体识别与管理协调小组"(AOIMSG),归口情报与安全副部长办公室。不到一年后,2022年7月15日,副国防部长凯瑟琳·希克斯正式宣告成立"全域异常现象解析办公室"(AARO),以更广的职权范围取代AOIMSG,覆盖空中、海面、太空与跨介质等所有领域。2023财年国防授权法又把AARO的职责进一步拓展至追溯1945年以来的历史案例调查。如今,AARO是五角大楼负责UAP事务的正式机构——同时也是"没有外星人"这一怀疑立场的对外门面。
AAWSAP 2007 AATIP 2008 UAPTF 2020 AOIMSG 2021 AARO 2022

The People Behind the Programs

项目背后的人

Sen. Harry Reid official portrait Politician · Architect 政治人物 · 缔造者
Sen. Harry Reid (1939–2021)
参议员哈里·里德(1939–2021)
Senate Majority Leader and the political force that quietly created AAWSAP. A long-time UFO enthusiast, Reid worked with Sens. Ted Stevens and Daniel Inouye to secure roughly $22 million for AAWSAP through DIA in 2007. He was a long-time friend of Bigelow Aerospace founder Robert Bigelow, who had contributed at least $10,000 to Reid's campaigns between 1998 and 2008. Without Reid, there is no modern Pentagon UAP program — and arguably no NYT bombshell ten years later.
参议院多数党领袖,也是默默推动AAWSAP从无到有的政治力量。里德长期对UFO议题抱有浓厚兴趣,2007年他与参议员特德·史蒂文斯、丹尼尔·井上联手,通过国防情报局为AAWSAP争取到了约两千两百万美元拨款。他与毕格罗航天创始人罗伯特·毕格罗私交甚笃;后者在1998年至2008年间向里德的竞选活动至少捐过一万美元。没有里德,就没有现代五角大楼的UAP项目——可以说,也就不会有十年后《纽约时报》的那次重磅爆料。
"If you want to talk about science, I'm all in." — 2019
"只要谈科学,我奉陪到底。" ——2019年
Robert Bigelow, Bigelow Aerospace founder Insider · Contractor 圈内人 · 承包商
Robert Bigelow
罗伯特·毕格罗
Billionaire founder of Budget Suites of America and Bigelow Aerospace. His research arm, Bigelow Aerospace Advanced Space Studies (BAASS), received the bulk of the AAWSAP contracts and conducted the actual research, including investigations of the Tic Tac case. In 1996, Bigelow purchased Skinwalker Ranch in Utah, the alleged hotspot of paranormal activity that AAWSAP investigated. He sold the ranch to real-estate tycoon Brandon Fugal in 2016. Bigelow has long maintained that he is "absolutely convinced" aliens are real and visiting Earth.
"美国预算套房"和毕格罗航天公司的亿万富翁创始人。他旗下的研究机构"毕格罗航天先进太空研究"(BAASS)获得了AAWSAP绝大部分合同,并实际承担了相关研究工作,包括对Tic Tac事件的调查。1996年,毕格罗买下犹他州的"皮行者牧场"——这片号称超自然现象频发的土地,正是AAWSAP研究的对象之一。2016年,他将牧场出售给地产大亨布兰登·富格尔。毕格罗本人一直公开表示,他"百分之百相信"外星人真实存在并且正在造访地球。
Luis Elizondo, former Pentagon intelligence official Insider · Disputed 圈内人 · 立场存争议
Luis Elizondo
路易斯·埃利松多
Former Pentagon intelligence official who claims to have led the AATIP program until his October 2017 resignation — a claim the Pentagon has publicly contested. He provided the three Pentagon UAP videos (FLIR, GIMBAL, GOFAST) — alongside former DASD Christopher Mellon — to The New York Times, which broke them on December 16, 2017. He co-founded To The Stars Academy with Tom DeLonge of Blink-182 in 2017, and published "Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs" in August 2024. He is one of the public faces of the whistleblower position and claims the Pentagon holds non-human biological evidence — though he has never personally seen any.
前五角大楼情报官员,自称在2017年10月辞职之前领导过AATIP项目——但五角大楼公开否认了这一说法。他与前国防部副助理部长克里斯托弗·梅隆一同,将五角大楼三段UAP视频(FLIR、GIMBAL、GOFAST)提供给《纽约时报》,后者于2017年12月16日将这些视频公之于众。2017年,他与"Blink-182"乐队成员汤姆·德隆共同创立了"星空学院"。2024年8月,他出版了《迫在眉睫:五角大楼追踪UFO的内幕》一书。他是吹哨人立场最具公众形象的代言人之一,并声称五角大楼掌握着"非人类生物"的证据——不过他本人也从未亲眼见过这些证据。

📰 The 2017 New York Times Bombshell

📰 2017年《纽约时报》的重磅炸弹

December 16, 2017. A single front-page New York Times article — and three short Pentagon videos — broke the dam.

2017年12月16日,《纽约时报》头版上的一篇文章——和三段简短的五角大楼视频——彻底冲垮了堤坝。

What Changed 什么变了
From "Tinfoil Hat" to Front Page Overnight
从"锡纸帽"到头版头条,一夜之间
Before December 16, 2017, the term "UFO" was almost untouchable in serious American journalism. After it, the conversation shifted permanently. Within weeks, History Channel was producing the documentary series "Unidentified: Inside America's UFO Investigation" featuring Elizondo. By 2019, Pentagon spokeswoman Susan Gough confirmed publicly that the videos were genuine and made by naval aviators. By 2020, the Pentagon formally declassified them. The journalistic decision to put UAPs on the front page of The New York Times — under the bylines of two NYT staffers and a Pulitzer-credentialed investigative reporter — gave other mainstream outlets cover to cover the story seriously for the first time in decades.
在2017年12月16日之前,"UFO"这个词在严肃美国新闻业中几乎是禁忌。在那之后,整场公共讨论的方向被永久改变了。短短数周之内,历史频道便开始制作纪录片系列《Unidentified:揭秘美国UFO调查》,主角正是埃利松多。到了2019年,五角大楼发言人苏珊·高夫公开证实,这些视频是真实的,由海军飞行员拍摄。2020年,五角大楼正式将其解密。把UAP送上《纽约时报》头版的这一编辑决定——并以两位时报内部记者与一位获过普利策提名的调查记者联名署名——给了其他主流媒体一个台阶,让它们几十年来第一次得以严肃地报道这一议题。
Why 2017 为什么是2017年
A Resignation, Three Videos, and a Sympathetic Editor
一次辞职、三段视频,和一位愿意刊发的编辑
Why did the story break in December 2017 and not earlier? Several things converged. Luis Elizondo had just resigned from the Pentagon in October. He, along with former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Christopher Mellon, was now free to share the three Pentagon videos with the press. Leslie Kean had spent years cultivating sources inside the Pentagon's tiny UAP community. Tom DeLonge's To The Stars Academy launched the same year, becoming a public-facing collection point for Pentagon insiders. And The New York Times under James Bennet was willing to run a story that would have been killed at most American newspapers a decade earlier. The editorial tipping point was as important as the leak itself.
为什么这则故事会在2017年12月集中爆发,而不是更早?因为多重因素恰巧汇聚。路易斯·埃利松多刚于10月从五角大楼辞职。他与前国防部副助理部长克里斯托弗·梅隆终于可以自由地把那三段五角大楼视频交给媒体。莱斯利·基恩多年来一直在五角大楼极小的UAP圈子里耐心耕耘人脉。汤姆·德隆的"星空学院"也恰好在同一年成立,成为了五角大楼内部人士可以公开汇聚的对外平台。而由詹姆斯·班尼特主政的《纽约时报》,愿意刊发一篇换在十年前几乎肯定会被任何美国主流报纸毙掉的稿件。编辑层面的临界点,与那次泄密本身同样重要。

⚖️ The Watershed Hearing (July 26, 2023)

⚖️ 决定性的听证会(2023年7月26日)

For the first time in U.S. history, three sworn witnesses — a retired Navy commander, a former Navy pilot, and a retired Air Force intelligence officer — told Congress on the record that the U.S. government has been hiding what it knows about UAPs.

这是美国历史上第一次,三位宣誓证人——一位退役海军中校、一位前海军飞行员和一位退役空军情报官——在国会的正式记录中明确指出:美国政府一直在隐瞒他们对UAP的所知。

The three witnesses (Graves, Grusch, Fravor) testifying before the House Oversight subcommittee, July 26, 2023 三位证人(格雷夫斯、格鲁什、弗拉沃尔)在众议院监督委员会作证,2023年7月26日

Ryan Graves, David Grusch, and David Fravor at the House Oversight subcommittee hearing on UAPs, July 26, 2023. Source: Wikimedia Commons (public domain).

瑞安·格雷夫斯、戴维·格鲁什与戴维·弗拉沃尔在众议院监督委员会UAP听证会上,2023年7月26日。来源:维基共享资源(公有领域)。

DF
Witness · The Commander 证人 · 海军指挥官
Cmdr. David Fravor (USN, Ret.)
戴维·弗拉沃尔中校(美国海军退役)
Commanding officer of Strike Fighter Squadron 41 ("Black Aces") aboard the USS Nimitz at the time of the November 14, 2004 Tic Tac encounter. He visually observed the object for about five minutes alongside his wingman Lt. Cmdr. Alex Dietrich and their two WSOs. At the July 26, 2023 hearing, Fravor walked the subcommittee through the encounter step by step under oath. His testimony added an under-appreciated detail: in the years following 2004, the Navy made no formal effort to investigate what he and his crew had seen. He has appeared in 60 Minutes, the Joe Rogan Experience, and Lex Fridman's podcast, and his account has remained internally consistent across every retelling.
2004年11月14日Tic Tac事件发生时,他是尼米兹号航母上打击战斗机第41中队(绰号"黑面")的指挥官。当时他与僚机飞行员亚历克斯·迪特里希中校以及两名武器系统官,一起目视观察那个物体长达约五分钟。在2023年7月26日的听证会上,弗拉沃尔在宣誓之下,向小组委员会一步步还原了整个遭遇过程。他的证词中还有一个常被忽视的细节:2004年事件之后的那些年里,海军并未就他和机组成员所见展开任何正式调查。他先后出现在《60分钟》、《乔·罗根经验》和莱克斯·弗里德曼播客上,每一次的陈述始终保持内部一致。
Ryan Graves testifying, July 26, 2023 Witness · The Pilot Advocate 证人 · 飞行员倡导者
Ryan Graves
瑞安·格雷夫斯
Former Navy F/A-18F pilot with VFA-11 ("Red Rippers") aboard USS Theodore Roosevelt, where he and his squadron observed UAPs near-daily off the East Coast in 2014–2015. Founder of Americans for Safe Aerospace, the largest pilot-led UAP advocacy organization. At the hearing he framed UAPs primarily as an aviation-safety issue, arguing that the Department of Defense and the FAA need a stigma-free reporting pipeline so that pilots can disclose encounters without ending their careers. He emphasized commercial pilots — not just military ones — also see UAPs but rarely report them.
前美国海军F/A-18F飞行员,曾在西奥多·罗斯福号上的VFA-11"红色开膛手"中队服役。2014至2015年间,他和中队战友在东海岸训练空域几乎每天都能看到UAP。他是美国最大的飞行员主导UAP倡导组织"守护美国航空安全"的创始人。在听证会上,他主要把UAP定位为一个航空安全议题,并指出国防部和联邦航空管理局必须建立一条没有污名的汇报渠道,让飞行员能够在不毁掉职业生涯的前提下如实报告遭遇。他还特别强调,并不只是军方飞行员,民航飞行员同样会遇到UAP,只是很少有人愿意正式上报。

"This is a public safety issue. The American people deserve to know what's flying in their skies. It's true. It's real. And the American people have a right to learn about it."

"这是一个事关公共安全的问题。美国人民有权知道,他们头顶的天空里到底飞着什么。这是真的,这是真实存在的——美国人民有权了解一切。"

— Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN), opening the hearing, July 26, 2023

——蒂姆·伯切特众议员(共和党,田纳西州),听证会开场致辞,2023年7月26日

🔬 The Scientific Front

🔬 科学阵线

While Pentagon insiders argue with each other, a handful of academic scientists are quietly building the first peer-reviewed search for technosignatures in human history.

就在五角大楼内部派系彼此争吵之际,一小群学院科学家正悄然搭建起人类历史上第一个经过同行评议的"技术信号"搜索体系。

Observation Image 观测图像
All We Ever Saw of It Was a Dot
我们看到它的全部,只是一个光点
'Oumuamua was discovered as it was already on its way out of the solar system, traveling fast enough that no spacecraft could catch it. The total observational data we have on the first interstellar object ever detected amounts to a series of telescope images of a faint dot against a star field — like the one below, captured by the William Herschel Telescope. Everything we know about its shape, composition, and behavior has been inferred from how that dot moved and how its brightness changed over time. The follow-up interstellar visitors 2I/Borisov (2019) and 3I/ATLAS (2025) gave astronomers more time to study, but neither was as anomalous as 'Oumuamua.
人类发现'Oumuamua时,它已经在飞离太阳系的路上,速度之快让任何现有航天器都无法追上。我们对这颗人类历史上第一颗被发现的星际天体所掌握的全部直接观测数据,仅是一系列望远镜拍下的星空背景中的微弱光点——例如下方这张由威廉·赫歇尔望远镜拍摄的图像。我们对它形状、组成与行为的全部认识,都是通过这个光点的位置变化和亮度变化反推出来的。后来发现的两位星际访客——2I/Borisov(2019年)和3I/ATLAS(2025年)——给了天文学家更多研究时间,但都没有'Oumuamua那般反常。
Enhanced telescope image of 'Oumuamua against a starfield 增强后的'Oumuamua望远镜图像,背景为星空

Enhanced observational image of 'Oumuamua (the bright dot, center) captured by the William Herschel Telescope. Source: ESO/Queen's University Belfast / Wikimedia Commons.

增强后的'Oumuamua观测图像(中心亮点),由威廉·赫歇尔望远镜拍摄。来源:ESO / 贝尔法斯特女王大学 / 维基共享资源。

Galileo Project Method 伽利略项目的方法
Sensors First, Conclusions Last
先有传感器,再下结论
Loeb's deliberate methodology contrasts with everything else in the UAP space. The Galileo Project does not start from witness reports. It builds dedicated observatories, calibrates them rigorously, and lets them run continuously, capturing every object that crosses their field of view. Identified objects (birds, balloons, planes, satellites) are tagged and discarded. Anything that can't be classified is queued for deeper analysis. The data is open-source. Findings are submitted to peer-reviewed journals. Loeb's argument is methodological rather than ideological: whatever the answer turns out to be, the world deserves to find out using the same scientific tools we'd use for any other phenomenon — not classified Pentagon programs or anonymous insider claims.
勒布刻意采用的研究方法,与UAP领域的其他一切都形成鲜明对比。伽利略项目不从目击报告出发,而是搭建专门的观测站,进行严格校准,让它们持续运行,把每一个进入视野的物体全部记录下来。可识别的物体(鸟、气球、飞机、卫星)会被打上标签并剔除;无法分类的,则进入更深入的分析队列。所有数据都是开源的,研究结果通过同行评议的期刊发表。勒布的主张更多是方法论而非意识形态:不论最后的答案是什么,世界都应当通过我们用于研究任何其他现象的同一套科学工具去寻找答案——而不是依靠秘密的五角大楼项目,或匿名的圈内人爆料。

❓ The Unresolved Truth

❓ 悬而未决的真相

The skeptical voice inside the Pentagon. The legislation that almost passed. The 1,652 cases AARO is now tracking. What we actually know — and what we still don't.

五角大楼内部的怀疑之声。那部差一点就通过的立法。AARO正在追踪的1,652起案例。我们究竟知道什么——又有什么仍然不知道。

Historical Record Report 历史记录报告
March 8, 2024 — The Pentagon's Most Comprehensive Review
2024年3月8日——五角大楼有史以来最全面的审查
On March 8, 2024, AARO published its Historical Record Report Volume 1, the most comprehensive Pentagon review of US government UAP investigations from 1945 to 2023 ever published. The report's central conclusions: there is no verifiable evidence the US government, any of its components, or any private entity, has any UAP technology or biological remains; many of the most-cited "secret programs" are well-documented but legitimate Special Access Programs unrelated to UAPs; and many witnesses to "alien" technology had simply observed classified human-made systems they were not cleared to know about. The Guardian's coverage called the report a "shake-up" of UFO culture. Whistleblowers say the report is incomplete and that genuine compartmented programs were not within AARO's reach.
2024年3月8日,AARO公布了《历史记录报告 第一卷》,这是迄今为止五角大楼对1945年至2023年间美国政府UAP调查工作最全面的一次官方梳理。报告的核心结论包括:没有任何可验证的证据表明美国政府、其下属任何部门或任何私营机构掌握UAP技术或生物遗骸;许多被外界反复引用的所谓"秘密项目",实际上是有据可查但合法的特别准入项目,与UAP并无关系;许多自称见过"外星"技术的目击者,实际上只是无意中目睹了他们没有许可知晓的人类机密系统。《卫报》将这份报告形容为对UFO文化的一次"震荡"。而吹哨人则反驳称这份报告并不完整——真正高度区隔的项目根本不在AARO的访问权限之内。
Sen. Chuck Schumer Politician · Disclosure Act 政治人物 · 信息披露法案
Sen. Chuck Schumer — The UAP Disclosure Act
参议员查克·舒默——UAP信息披露法案
In July 2023, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Sen. Mike Rounds (R-SD) introduced the UAP Disclosure Act of 2023 as an amendment to the FY24 NDAA. The bill was modeled on the JFK Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992: it would have created an independent review board with subpoena power, established a presumption of disclosure for UAP-related government records, and authorized federal eminent domain over "recovered technologies of unknown origin and biological evidence of non-human intelligence." The eminent domain provision was the most explosive — and the first to be stripped. The version included in the December 2023 FY24 NDAA was significantly watered down. Schumer and Rounds reintroduced a revised version in 2024.
2023年7月,参议院多数党领袖查克·舒默(民主党,纽约州)与参议员迈克·朗兹(共和党,南达科他州)联名将《2023年UAP信息披露法案》作为修正案附入2024财年国防授权法。这部法案以1992年《肯尼迪遇刺记录收集法》为蓝本,旨在建立一个具有传唤权的独立审查委员会,确立"UAP相关政府档案默认披露"的原则,并授权联邦政府对"来源不明的回收技术和非人类智慧的生物证据"行使征用权。其中最具爆炸性的,正是这条征用条款——也是最先被砍掉的内容。最终在2023年12月通过的2024财年国防授权法版本,相较原案已大幅缩水。2024年,舒默与朗兹再次重新提交了修订后的版本。
The Counter-Argument 反方观点
Why Whistleblowers Say AARO's Findings Mean Nothing
为何吹哨人认为AARO的结论毫无意义
The whistleblower camp's response to Kirkpatrick and the AARO reports rests on one core argument: a Special Access Program (SAP) that is properly compartmented and unacknowledged is, by definition, invisible to anyone without specific read-in. Grusch claims he was illegally denied access to such a program despite his Top Secret/SCI clearance. Elizondo agrees. From their perspective, the fact that AARO didn't find the program is not evidence the program doesn't exist — it's evidence that AARO doesn't have the right clearances to find it. The Schumer-Rounds Disclosure Act was an attempt to create an external mechanism powerful enough to break that compartmentalization. So far, it has failed.
面对柯克帕特里克与AARO报告,吹哨人阵营的反驳建立在一个核心逻辑之上:一个被严格区隔、未被官方承认的特别准入项目(SAP),按定义本来就对任何没有专门"读入"许可的人完全不可见。格鲁什声称,尽管自己持有最高机密/特殊情报许可,仍被非法地拒之门外。埃利松多也持相同看法。在他们看来,AARO没有找到这个项目,并不能证明它不存在——只能说明AARO并不具备找到它所需要的特定权限。舒默与朗兹推动的《信息披露法案》正是想要建立一个外部机制,让它的权力足够大、足以打破这种区隔。然而到目前为止,这一努力尚未成功。
What We Actually Know 我们真正知道的
The Confirmed Facts vs. The Open Questions
已证实的事实 与 仍未解的疑问
What is documented: The Pentagon has run, and continues to run, formal programs that study UAPs (AAWSAP, UAPTF, AARO). Trained military pilots have repeatedly observed objects they cannot identify in restricted training airspace. Three videos (FLIR, GIMBAL, GOFAST) have been formally declassified. AARO is tracking 1,652 cumulative cases. A small percentage of those cases remain genuinely unexplained.

What remains contested: Whether any recovered non-human craft or biological material exists in US possession. Whether AATIP was an official program. Whether Luis Elizondo ran it. Whether David Grusch's 40+ sources are credible. Whether the unexplained cases involve novel physics, foreign adversary technology, or sensor / interpretation errors not yet characterized.
有据可查的部分:五角大楼曾经、并且仍在运行多个研究UAP的正式项目(AAWSAP、UAPTF、AARO)。训练有素的军方飞行员在限制训练空域内反复目击到他们无法辨识的物体。三段视频(FLIR、GIMBAL、GOFAST)已被正式解密。AARO目前累计追踪的案例已达1,652起。其中一小部分至今仍无法解释。

仍有争议的部分:美国是否真的掌握任何回收的非人类飞行器或生物材料;AATIP是否是一个正式项目;路易斯·埃利松多是否真的领导过它;戴维·格鲁什提到的四十余名信息来源是否可信;那些尚未解释的案例究竟涉及前所未见的物理现象、外国对手的先进技术,还是尚未被识别的传感器或解读偏差。

"[UAPs are] part of a larger issue of an increased number of training range incursions by unidentified aerial phenomena in recent years."

"[UAP]问题,是近年来不明空中现象越来越频繁地侵入训练空域这一更大问题的一部分。"

— Susan Gough, Pentagon spokeswoman, September 2019

——苏珊·高夫,五角大楼发言人,2019年9月

📅 The Complete Timeline (2004 → 2024)

📅 完整时间线(2004 → 2024)

Twenty years of incidents, programs, leaks, hearings, and reports — every key date that defines the modern UAP era.

二十年来的事件、项目、泄密、听证与报告——勾勒出现代UAP时代的每一个关键节点。

Era I — The Tic Tac Years

第一阶段——Tic Tac的岁月

2004
2004年
A Navy carrier strike group encounters something it can't explain. Officially, nothing happens for thirteen years.
一支海军航母打击群遭遇了一件他们无法解释的事。在接下来的十三年里,官方对此没有任何动作。
Early Nov 2004
2004年11月上旬

USS Princeton AEGIS Radar Tracks Anomalies for ~2 Weeks

普林斯顿号"宙斯盾"雷达连续约两周追踪到异常物体

SPY-1 radar aboard cruiser USS Princeton (CG-59) records objects descending from ~80,000 ft to ~20,000 ft in seconds for roughly two weeks prior to Fravor's intercept.
巡洋舰普林斯顿号(CG-59)上的SPY-1雷达记录到物体在数秒内从约八万英尺骤降至约两万英尺;这种情况在弗拉沃尔起飞拦截之前已经持续了约两周。
Nov 14, 2004
2004年11月14日

The Tic Tac Encounter

Tic Tac遭遇事件

Cmdr. David Fravor and his wingman, then-Lt. j.g. Alex Dietrich, with their two WSOs, visually observe a ~40 ft white oval object off the southern California coast. Chad Underwood, a WSO on a second Super Hornet, records the FLIR video in a follow-up sortie.
戴维·弗拉沃尔中校与其僚机飞行员——时任海军少尉的亚历克斯·迪特里希——连同两名武器系统官,在南加州沿海上空目视观察到一个约四十英尺长的白色椭圆物体。其后一架"超级大黄蜂"战机再次起飞追踪,后座武器系统官查德·安德伍德拍下了FLIR视频。

Era II — The Hidden Programs

第二阶段——隐秘的项目

2007–2012
2007–2012年
Sen. Harry Reid quietly funds the first modern Pentagon UAP program through the Defense Intelligence Agency.
参议员哈里·里德通过国防情报局,悄然为现代五角大楼第一个UAP项目铺设了资金通道。
Late 2007
2007年末

AAWSAP Funded — $22M Through DIA

AAWSAP获拨款——经国防情报局拨付2200万美元

Sens. Harry Reid, Ted Stevens, and Daniel Inouye insert the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program funding into the DoD black budget. Most contracts go to Robert Bigelow's BAASS.
参议员里德、史蒂文斯和井上将"先进航空航天武器系统应用项目"嵌入国防部黑色预算。绝大部分合同由罗伯特·毕格罗旗下的BAASS承接。
~2008–2012
约2008–2012年

AATIP Operates as a Smaller Program

AATIP作为一个更小的项目运作

The Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program runs as a successor or subset of AAWSAP. Luis Elizondo later claims he led it; the Pentagon publicly disputes this.
"先进航空航天威胁识别计划"作为AAWSAP的后继或子项目运行。路易斯·埃利松多此后声称由他领导,但五角大楼公开否认这一说法。
2012
2012年

AAWSAP Funding Officially Ends

AAWSAP正式结束拨款

DIA funding for AAWSAP ends. Elizondo later claims UAP work continued informally inside the Pentagon under the AATIP umbrella.
国防情报局对AAWSAP的资助宣告结束。埃利松多此后声称,UAP相关工作以非正式方式在五角大楼内部以AATIP的名义延续。

Era III — The East Coast Sightings

第三阶段——东海岸目击潮

2014–2015
2014–2015年
A radar upgrade and a new generation of pilots see UAPs almost every day off the coast of Virginia.
一次雷达升级,一群新生代飞行员,让弗吉尼亚海岸外几乎每天都能看到UAP。
2014
2014年

VFA-11 "Red Rippers" Get the AN/APG-79 AESA Radar

第11打击战斗机中队"红色开膛手"换装AN/APG-79有源相控阵雷达

Ryan Graves' squadron upgrades from APG-73 to APG-79 AESA. Within weeks, pilots are seeing UAPs near-daily over Virginia Beach training airspace.
瑞安·格雷夫斯所在的中队从APG-73升级到APG-79 AESA。雷达启用仅数周,飞行员便几乎每天都能在弗吉尼亚海滩训练空域上空看到UAP。
Jan 20, 2015
2015年1月20日

GIMBAL Video Recorded Off the East Coast

GIMBAL视频在东海岸拍摄

An F/A-18 from the USS Theodore Roosevelt carrier strike group films an object rotating mid-flight against strong winds.
"西奥多·罗斯福号"航母打击群一架F/A-18拍下了一个物体在强风中边飞行边自转的画面。
2015
2015年

GOFAST Video Recorded Off the East Coast

GOFAST视频在东海岸拍摄

A small object appears to skim above the ocean surface at very high speed. The aviator's voice marvels at how fast it appears to move.
一个小型物体以极高速度贴海面飞过。录音中的飞行员惊叹于它的速度。

Era IV — The Year Everything Changed

第四阶段——一切都变了的那一年

2017
2017年
A resignation, three videos, and a single newspaper story turn UFO into UAP.
一次辞职、三段视频、一篇新闻稿——把"UFO"变成了"UAP"。
Oct 4, 2017
2017年10月4日

Luis Elizondo Resigns from the Pentagon

路易斯·埃利松多从五角大楼辞职

Elizondo's resignation removes the gag on him sharing the three Pentagon UAP videos with The New York Times.
埃利松多的辞职,为他将五角大楼三段UAP视频提供给《纽约时报》扫除了最后的障碍。
Dec 16, 2017
2017年12月16日

"Glowing Auras and 'Black Money'" Hits the Front Page

《发光的光晕与"黑钱"》登上头版

Cooper, Blumenthal & Kean's NYT investigation breaks the AATIP program publicly for the first time. NYT and Washington Post publish FLIR and GIMBAL the same day. POLITICO publishes Bryan Bender's parallel deep-dive.
库珀、布卢门撒尔与基恩在《纽约时报》的调查报道首次公开揭露AATIP项目。同日,《纽约时报》与《华盛顿邮报》同步公布FLIR与GIMBAL视频。POLITICO杂志发表布莱恩·本德的另一篇深度报道。

Era V — Mainstream Acceptance

第五阶段——进入主流

2019–2021
2019–2021年
The Pentagon stops dodging. The first formal acknowledgments arrive.
五角大楼不再回避,第一批正式承认陆续到来。
Sep 2019
2019年9月

Pentagon Confirms the Videos Are Real

五角大楼正式确认视频真实

Pentagon spokeswoman Susan Gough publicly confirms the FLIR, GIMBAL, and GOFAST videos were made by US naval aviators.
五角大楼发言人苏珊·高夫公开证实,FLIR、GIMBAL和GOFAST三段视频均由美国海军飞行员拍摄。
Apr 27, 2020
2020年4月27日

Pentagon Formally Declassifies FLIR, GIMBAL, GOFAST

五角大楼正式解密FLIR、GIMBAL、GOFAST

For the first time, the Department of Defense formally releases and declassifies the three Navy UAP videos.
国防部首次正式公开并解密了这三段海军UAP视频。
Aug 14, 2020
2020年8月14日

UAP Task Force (UAPTF) Established

UAP特别工作组(UAPTF)成立

Deputy SecDef David Norquist establishes the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force under the Department of the Navy.
副国防部长戴维·诺奎斯特宣布在海军部下设立"不明空中现象特别工作组"。
May 16, 2021
2021年5月16日

60 Minutes Airs "UFOs on the Radar"

《60分钟》播出"UFOs on the Radar"

Bill Whitaker interviews Fravor, Dietrich, and Graves on CBS 60 Minutes. The segment brings UAPs into millions of American living rooms.
比尔·惠特克在CBS《60分钟》节目中采访弗拉沃尔、迪特里希与格雷夫斯。这一集让UAP话题走进数百万美国家庭。
Jun 25, 2021
2021年6月25日

ODNI Preliminary Assessment Released

ODNI《初步评估》报告发布

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence releases its first public UAP assessment: 144 incidents from 2004–2021, only 1 explained (a deflating balloon).
国家情报总监办公室发布其首份公开UAP评估报告:2004年至2021年间共144起事件,仅1起得到解释(一只正在漏气的气球)。
Jul 26, 2021
2021年7月26日

Avi Loeb Launches The Galileo Project at Harvard

阿维·勒布在哈佛启动"伽利略项目"

The first systematic, peer-reviewed academic project to search for technosignatures using dedicated scientific instruments launches — exactly two years to the day before the 2023 House Oversight hearing.
人类历史上第一个用专业科学仪器系统化、经同行评议地寻找技术信号的学术项目正式启动——恰好比2023年众议院听证会整整早了两年。

Era VI — AARO and the Hearing

第六阶段——AARO与听证会

2022–2023
2022–2023年
A new Pentagon office, a whistleblower complaint, and three witnesses raising their right hands.
一个新的五角大楼办公室、一份吹哨人申诉,以及三位高举右手宣誓的证人。
Jul 15, 2022
2022年7月15日

AARO Established

AARO成立

Deputy SecDef Kathleen Hicks establishes the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, replacing AOIMSG. Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick is appointed inaugural director the following month.
副国防部长凯瑟琳·希克斯宣告成立"全域异常现象解析办公室",取代AOIMSG。次月,肖恩·柯克帕特里克博士出任首任主任。
Jun 5, 2023
2023年6月5日

The Debrief Publishes the Grusch Story

《The Debrief》刊出格鲁什的故事

Leslie Kean and Ralph Blumenthal publish a long investigative piece detailing David Grusch's whistleblower claims to the Intelligence Community Inspector General.
莱斯利·基恩与拉尔夫·布卢门撒尔联合发表长篇调查报道,详细披露戴维·格鲁什向情报界监察长提交吹哨人申诉的全过程。
Jul 14, 2023
2023年7月14日

Schumer & Rounds Introduce the UAP Disclosure Act

舒默与朗兹提出《UAP信息披露法案》

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and Sen. Mike Rounds introduce the UAP Disclosure Act of 2023 as an NDAA amendment, modeled on the JFK Records Act.
参议院多数党领袖查克·舒默与参议员迈克·朗兹将《2023年UAP信息披露法案》以国防授权法修正案形式提出,蓝本是1992年《肯尼迪遇刺记录收集法》。
Jul 26, 2023
2023年7月26日

House Oversight UAP Hearing

众议院监督委员会UAP听证会

Fravor, Graves, and Grusch testify under oath before the House Oversight subcommittee. Grusch claims, in sworn testimony, that the US government runs a multi-decade UAP crash retrieval and reverse engineering program from which he was illegally denied access.
弗拉沃尔、格雷夫斯与格鲁什在众议院监督委员会下属小组委员会前宣誓作证。格鲁什在宣誓证词中明确指出,美国政府正在运行一个延续数十年的UAP坠机回收与逆向工程项目,而他本人被非法地拒之门外。
Aug 2023
2023年8月

The Intercept Reports on Grusch's Mental Health History

《拦截》披露格鲁什的精神健康经历

The Intercept, citing Loudoun County sheriff's records, reports that Grusch was committed to a mental health facility in October 2018 and was the subject of a similar 2014 police incident. Grusch attributes both to PTSD, grief and depression from his Afghanistan service; his security clearance was retained.
《拦截》杂志援引劳登郡警长办公室记录披露:格鲁什于2018年10月曾被送往一家精神健康机构收治,2014年也有类似的警方介入记录。格鲁什本人将此归因于在阿富汗服役期间患上的PTSD、悲伤与抑郁;其安全许可始终未被吊销。
Dec 2023
2023年12月

FY24 NDAA Passes — Watered-Down Disclosure Act

2024财年国防授权法通过——大幅缩水的信息披露法案

A significantly watered-down version of the Schumer-Rounds UAP Disclosure Act is included in the FY24 NDAA. The eminent domain provisions over "recovered technologies" are stripped. Kirkpatrick resigns as AARO director shortly after.
舒默-朗兹版《UAP信息披露法案》在2024财年国防授权法中以大幅缩水的形式获得通过。原案中针对"回收技术"的征用条款被删除。不久之后,柯克帕特里克辞去AARO主任职务。

Era VII — The Establishment Counter

第七阶段——建制派的反击

2024
2024年
The Pentagon publishes its most comprehensive review ever — and concludes there are no aliens.
五角大楼发布了有史以来最全面的一次审查报告——结论是:没有外星人。
Jan 19, 2024
2024年1月19日

Kirkpatrick's Scientific American Op-Ed

柯克帕特里克在《科学美国人》撰文

"Here's What I Learned as the U.S. Government's UFO Hunter" — Kirkpatrick publicly states that AARO "discovered a few things, and none were about aliens."
《以下是我作为美国政府UFO猎手所学到的》——柯克帕特里克公开表示,AARO"发现了寥寥数物,但无一与外星人有关"。
Feb 2024
2024年2月

Dr. Jon Kosloski Appointed Second AARO Director

乔恩·科斯洛斯基博士出任AARO第二任主任

Dr. Jon Kosloski is named AARO's second director, succeeding Kirkpatrick.
乔恩·科斯洛斯基博士被任命为AARO第二任主任,接替柯克帕特里克。
Mar 8, 2024
2024年3月8日

AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1

AARO《历史记录报告 第一卷》

AARO publishes its most comprehensive review ever, covering US government UAP investigations from 1945 to 2023. Conclusion: no evidence of any crash retrieval program, no alien technology in US possession.
AARO发布迄今最全面的一次审查报告,覆盖1945年至2023年间美国政府UAP调查的全部历史。结论是:没有任何证据表明存在坠机回收计划,也没有任何外星技术在美国手中。
Aug 2024
2024年8月

Elizondo Publishes "Imminent"

埃利松多出版《迫在眉睫》

Luis Elizondo publishes "Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs" with William Morrow, repeating his claims that the Pentagon holds non-human biological evidence.
路易斯·埃利松多在William Morrow出版社推出新书《迫在眉睫:五角大楼追踪UFO的内幕》,重申五角大楼掌握"非人类生物"证据的说法。
Nov 14, 2024
2024年11月14日

AARO FY24 Consolidated Annual Report

AARO《2024财年综合年度报告》

757 new UAP reports received May 2023 – June 2024. 1,652 cumulative cases tracked across AARO's lifetime. Single-digit percentage remain "truly anomalous." Senate UAP hearing held the day before.
2023年5月至2024年6月期间共收到757份新UAP报告。AARO累计追踪案例总数达1,652起。"真正异常"的案例占比为个位数百分点。前一天,参议院召开了一场UAP听证会。
Dec 2024
2024年12月

Schumer-Rounds Reintroduce a Revised Disclosure Act

舒默与朗兹重新提交修订版披露法案

Schumer and Rounds reintroduce a revised UAP Disclosure Act, again attempting to establish independent disclosure mechanisms. The legislation remains in limbo.
舒默与朗兹再次提交修订后的《UAP信息披露法案》,试图建立独立的信息披露机制。该法案至今仍处于悬而未决的状态。

📺 Where to Learn More

📺 延伸阅读与观看

If you want to dig deeper, these are the most credible primary sources — full hearings, mainstream broadcasts, and long-form interviews with the actual witnesses.

如果你想深入了解,下列是最具公信力的一手素材——完整听证会录像、主流媒体节目,以及对当事人本人的长篇访谈。

Primary · C-SPAN 一手 · C-SPAN
House Oversight UAP Hearing — July 26, 2023
众议院监督委员会UAP听证会——2023年7月26日
The full, unedited C-SPAN recording of the watershed House Oversight subcommittee hearing, with sworn testimony from Fravor, Graves, and Grusch. Several hours long, but the single most important primary document of the modern UAP era.
C-SPAN对这场具有分水岭意义的众议院监督委员会听证会的完整原始录像,包括弗拉沃尔、格雷夫斯与格鲁什的宣誓证词。时长数小时,但堪称现代UAP时代最重要的一份一手文献。
TV · CBS 电视 · CBS
60 Minutes: "UFOs on the Radar" (May/Aug 2021)
《60分钟》:"UFOs on the Radar"(2021年5月/8月)
Bill Whitaker's Emmy-grade segment for CBS 60 Minutes, with on-camera interviews with Fravor, Dietrich, Graves, and Mellon. The most-watched mainstream broadcast on UAPs in twenty years.
比尔·惠特克为CBS《60分钟》制作的艾美奖级专题节目,采访对象包括弗拉沃尔、迪特里希、格雷夫斯与梅隆。这是过去二十年里收视最广的UAP主流电视节目。
Long-Form · Lex Fridman 长访谈 · Lex Fridman
Lex Fridman Podcast #122 — David Fravor (Sep 8, 2020)
Lex Fridman 播客 #122 ——戴维·弗拉沃尔(2020年9月8日)
A long, technical conversation with the Tic Tac commander himself, going deep on the encounter, sensor systems, and what trained pilots actually look for when they see something unusual.
与Tic Tac事件指挥官本人进行的一场长篇技术对谈,深入探讨遭遇细节、传感器系统,以及训练有素的飞行员在看到异常物体时究竟会留意什么。
Long-Form · Joe Rogan 长访谈 · Joe Rogan
Joe Rogan Experience #1361 — David Fravor & Jeremy Corbell
Joe Rogan Experience #1361 ——戴维·弗拉沃尔与杰里米·科尔贝尔
A three-hour deep dive into the Tic Tac encounter with both Fravor and documentary filmmaker Jeremy Corbell. Notable for the level of technical detail Fravor is willing to share in a long-form, unscripted setting.
长达三小时的深度访谈,弗拉沃尔与纪录片导演杰里米·科尔贝尔联袂出席,全面回顾Tic Tac事件。这一期最值得注意的是,弗拉沃尔在不设剧本的长访谈中愿意分享的技术细节之丰富。
Investigative · Podcast 调查 · 播客
Weaponized — George Knapp & Jeremy Corbell
Weaponized ——乔治·纳普与杰里米·科尔贝尔
Investigative podcast hosted by Emmy-winning KLAS-TV reporter George Knapp (who broke the original Bob Lazar story in 1989) and filmmaker Jeremy Corbell. The most consistently sourced UAP podcast in the field.
由艾美奖获得者、KLAS-TV调查记者乔治·纳普(1989年率先报道鲍勃·拉扎尔事件)与导演杰里米·科尔贝尔联合主持的调查类播客。是UAP领域内信源最稳定、最可靠的一档节目。
Science · Podcast 科学 · 播客
Theories of Everything — Curt Jaimungal
Theories of Everything ——柯特·杰孟戈
Long-form interviews that bring together both scientists (including Avi Loeb) and witnesses/whistleblowers in the same intellectual space. Useful for understanding how the science and journalism camps actually disagree.
长篇深度访谈节目,把科学家(包括阿维·勒布)、目击者与吹哨人放进同一个思想场域。对于理解科学界与新闻界双方的真正分歧之处,这档节目非常有帮助。

📚 References & Sources

📚 参考资料与来源

Every claim in this Spark is traceable to one or more of the sources below — primary government documents, mainstream investigative journalism, peer-reviewed and skeptical voices, Wikipedia for general reference, and books for further reading.

本Spark的每一项陈述,都可以追溯到下列来源中的一个或多个:政府一手文件、主流调查新闻、经过同行评议和持怀疑立场的研究、维基百科的一般背景资料,以及供进一步阅读的图书。

Primary Government Sources

一、政府一手文件

  1. AARO FY24 Consolidated Annual Report on UAP, Department of Defense, November 14, 2024. media.defense.gov
  2. AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1, Department of Defense, March 8, 2024. media.defense.gov
  3. ODNI Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena, Office of the Director of National Intelligence, June 25, 2021. dni.gov
  4. David Grusch — Statement for the Record, House Oversight Committee, July 26, 2023. oversight.house.gov
  5. David Fravor — Statement for the Record, House Oversight Committee, July 26, 2023. oversight.house.gov
  6. Ryan Graves — Statement for the Record, House Oversight Committee, July 26, 2023. oversight.house.gov
  7. Congressional Hearing Transcript, "Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Implications on National Security, Public Safety, and Government Transparency," House Oversight Committee, July 26, 2023. congress.gov
  8. UAP Disclosure Act of 2024 (S.Amdt.2610), 118th Congress. congress.gov
  9. Schumer-Rounds Press Release on the UAP Disclosure Act, July 14, 2023. democrats.senate.gov
  10. All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, official website. aaro.mil
  11. NASA Independent Study Team Report on UAP, September 14, 2023. science.nasa.gov/uap

Journalism

二、新闻报道

  1. Helene Cooper, Ralph Blumenthal & Leslie Kean, "Glowing Auras and 'Black Money': The Pentagon's Mysterious U.F.O. Program," The New York Times, December 16, 2017. nytimes.com
  2. Bryan Bender, "The Pentagon's Secret Search for UFOs," POLITICO Magazine, December 16, 2017. politico.com
  3. Bryan Bender, "How Harry Reid, a Terrorist Interrogator and the Singer From Blink-182 Took UFOs Mainstream," POLITICO. politico.com
  4. Bill Whitaker, "UFOs Regularly Spotted in Restricted U.S. Airspace," 60 Minutes, CBS News, August 29, 2021. cbsnews.com
  5. Ken Klippenstein & Daniel Boguslaw, "UFO Whistleblower Kept Security Clearance After Psychiatric Detention," The Intercept, August 9, 2023. theintercept.com
  6. Keith Kloor, "The Media Loves This UFO Expert Who Says He Worked for an Obscure Pentagon Program. Did He?" The Intercept, June 1, 2019. theintercept.com
  7. Leslie Kean & Ralph Blumenthal, "Intelligence Officials Say U.S. Has Retrieved Craft of Non-Human Origin," The Debrief, June 5, 2023. thedebrief.org

Scientific / Skeptical Voices

三、科学与怀疑论声音

  1. Sean Kirkpatrick, "Here's What I Learned as the U.S. Government's UFO Hunter," Scientific American, January 19, 2024. scientificamerican.com
  2. Edward Helmore, "Pentagon Ex-UFO Chief Says Conspiracy Theorists in Government Drive Spending," The Guardian, January 27, 2024. theguardian.com
  3. Edward Helmore, "He Quit Heading the Pentagon's UFO Office. Now a Report of His Has Shaken Up Ufology," The Guardian, March 22, 2024. theguardian.com
  4. The Galileo Project, Harvard University. projects.iq.harvard.edu/galileo

Wikipedia (General Reference)

四、维基百科(一般背景)

  1. David Grusch UFO Whistleblower Claims
  2. Pentagon UFO Videos
  3. Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program
  4. Luis Elizondo
  5. All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office
  6. The Galileo Project
  7. USS Nimitz UFO Incident
  8. 'Oumuamua

Books for Further Reading

五、延伸阅读书目

  1. Luis Elizondo, Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs (William Morrow, 2024).
  2. Avi Loeb, Extraterrestrial: The First Sign of Intelligent Life Beyond Earth (Mariner, 2021).
  3. Avi Loeb, Interstellar: The Search for Extraterrestrial Life and Our Future in the Stars (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2023).
  4. Leslie Kean, UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Record (Harmony, 2010).
  5. D.W. Pasulka, American Cosmic: UFOs, Religion, Technology (Oxford University Press, 2019).